General
C. E. CAMPBELL, Appellant, v. E. G. POTTER, Receiver of the Stewart Fruit Company, Appellee
57 F.2d 1073·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
C. E. CAMPBELL, Appellant, v. E. G. POTTER, Receiver of the Stewart Fruit Company, Appellee.
No. 6694.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 4, 1932.
W. H. Metson, of San Francisco, Cal., and Walter Sorensen, of Fresno, Cal., for appellant.
Charles A. C'hristin, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to oral motion of counsel for appellee, ordered appeal dismissed for failure of appellant to print record and file printed brief before argument; mandate forthwith.