Contracts · MBE-tested
Leh et al. v. General Petroleum Corp. et al.
380 U.S. 930·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 348.
Leh et al. v. General Petroleum Corp. et al.
Maxwell Keith for petitioner Leh on the motion, Howard Painter, Francis R. Kirkham, William E. Muss-man, Thomas E. Haven, George W. Jansen, Jack E. Woods, Moses Lasky, Wayne H. Knight and Edmund D. Buckley for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. (Certiorari granted, 379 U. S. 877.) Upon consideration of the motion of petitioner Leh for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis, it is ordered that the case be heard on the typewritten record.