General
Woody et al. v. Sterling Aluminum Products, Inc., et al.
386 U.S. 957·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 946.
Woody et al. v. Sterling Aluminum Products, Inc., et al.
Jerome J. Duff for petitioners^ Daniel Bartlett and William Stix for Sterling Aluminum Products, Inc., and Donald S. Siegel for' International Association of Machinists et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.