General
O'Connell v. Louisville and Southern Indiana Traction Company et al.
73 Ind. App. 697·Appellate Court of Indiana·1919·IN
Brief incoming
Source-anchored Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
O’Connell v. Louisville and Southern Indiana Traction Company et al.
[No. 10,177.
Filed December 19, 1919.
Rehearing denied April 20, 1920.]
From Floyd Circuit Court; Alexander Dotvling, Special Judge.
’ Action between Margaret M. O’Connell and the Louisville and Southern Indiana Traction Company and another. From the judgment rendered, O’Connell appeals.
Affirmed.
Laurent A. Douglass, for appellant.
George H. Voight and George H. Hester, for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Remy, J.]
Remy, J.
The question involved in this appeal is the same as that presented in the case of Wilkie v. Reynolds (1905), 34 Ind. App. 527, 72 N. E. 179, and on the authority of that case the judgment is affirmed.