Tax
In the Matter of the Application of The Manhattan Railway Company et al., Respondents, v. Julia A. Kent, Individually, etc., et al., Appellants
145 N.Y. 595·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of The Manhattan Railway Company et al., Respondents, v. Julia A. Kent, Individually, etc., et al., Appellants.
(Argued January 28, 1895;
decided February 26, 1895.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made the first Monday of October, 1894, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a re-taxation of costs.
Charles L. Pashley for appellants.
William H. Godden for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.