Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Eisler v. United States, 1948 — 335 U.S. 857 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Eisler v. United States
335 U.S. 857·Supreme Court of the United States·1948
Mr. Justice Burton took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 255.
Eisler v. United States.
David Rein, Abraham J. Isserman, Carol King and Joseph Forer for petitioner.
Solicitor General Perlman, Robert S. Erdahl and Harold D. Cohen for the United States. Robert W. Kenny filed a brief for the National Lawyers Guild, as amicus curiae, supporting the petition.
[MAJORITY]
United States
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari granted.
Mr. Justice Burton took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.