Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lovelace et al. v. DeChamplain, 1975 — 420 U.S. 985 · caselaw · US
General
Lovelace et al. v. DeChamplain
420 U.S. 985·Supreme Court of the United States·1975
Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice Marshall would deny the application except upon condition that respondent be released on bail.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. A-687.
Lovelace et al. v. DeChamplain.
[MAJORITY]
Application for further stay of order of United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri, presented to Mr. Justice Blackmun, and by him referred to the Court, granted pending the filing on or before April 10, 1975, of petition for writ of certiorari and final disposition thereon.
Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice Marshall would deny the application except upon condition that respondent be released on bail.