Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Southside Virginia Telecasting Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission et al., 1956 — 350 U.S. 1001 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Southside Virginia Telecasting Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.
350 U.S. 1001·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 681.
Southside Virginia Telecasting Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.
Leonard H. Marks and Paul Dobin for petitioner. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Barnes, Daniel M. Friedman, Warren E. Baker and Richard A. Solomon for the Federal Communications Commission, and Paul A. Porter, Harry M. Plotkin and Reed Miller for the Petersburg Television Corporation, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.