Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Augusta Rork, Appellant, v. The City of New York, Respondent, 1905 — 182 N.Y. 508 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Augusta Rork, Appellant, v. The City of New York, Respondent
182 N.Y. 508·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Augusta Rork, Appellant, v. The City of New York, Respondent.
(Argued May 5, 1905;
decided June 6, 1905.)
Rork v. City of New York, 102 App. Div. 616, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment, entered March 10, 1905, up,on an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, overruling plaintiff’s exceptions, ordered to be heard in the first instance by the Appellate Division, denying a motion for a new trial and directing that the complaint be dismissed.
George H. Fletcher for appellant.
John J. Delany, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly and Terence Farley of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ.