Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
HUGHES TOOL CO. v. TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC., et al., 1965 — 380 U.S. 249 · caselaw · US
General
HUGHES TOOL CO. v. TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC., et al.
380 U.S. 24913 L. Ed. 2d 818·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HUGHES TOOL CO. v. TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC., et al.
No. 501.
Argued March 4, 1965.
Decided March 8, 1965.
Chester C. Davis argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Paul A. Porter, Victor H. Kramer, Abe Krash, Dennis G. Lyons, Werner J. Kron-stein and Daniel A. Rezneck.
Bruce Bromley argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief for the Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States et al. were William C. Chanler, William M. Bradner, Jr., and Edward R. Neaher. On the brief for Trans World Airlines, Inc., was John F. Sonnett.
Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, O. D. Ozment and Robert L. Toomey filed a memorandum for the Civil Aeronautics Board, as amicus curiae.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.