Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Dawn, dba Game Co. v. Sterling Drug, Inc., et al.; Smilgus v. Letts, Judge; Ex parte Kent, New Rider et al. v. Board of Education of Independent School District No. 1, Pawnee County, Oklahoma, et al.; Union Pacific Railroad Co. et al. v. City and County of Denver et al.; Coker et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; Wesson v. Levin et al.; City of Miami v. Spicy; D'Orsay v. United States; White v. United States; Ring v. California; Frist v. Haynsworth, Chief Judge, U. S. Court of Appeals, et al.; Serrano v. New York; Freed et al. v. Michigan Department of Treasury, Revenue Division; Lyons v. Indiana, 1974 — 415 U.S. 939 · caselaw · US