Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Emspak v. United States, 1954 — 347 U.S. 1006 · caselaw · US
General
Emspak v. United States
347 U.S. 1006·Supreme Court of the United States·1954
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 67.
Emspak v. United States.
David Scribner, Frank J. Donner, Arthur Kinoy and Allan R. Rosenberg for petitioner.
Robert L. Stern, then Acting Solicitor General, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg, Carl H. Imlay and John R. Wilkins for the United States. Ernest Angelí, Osmond K. Fraenkel, Arthur Garfield Hays and Herbert Monte Levy filed a brief for the American Civil Liberties Union, as amicus curiae, urging reversal.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari granted, except as to question No. 4 presented by the petition for the writ, 346 U. S. 809. Argued January 12-13, 1954. This case is ordered restored to the docket for reargument.