Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York Relative to Acquiring Title to the Lands, Tenements and Hereditaments Required for the Purpose of Opening One Hundred and Seventy-fifth Street from the Grand Boulevard and Concourse to Anthony Avenue, in the Twenty-fourth Ward of the City of New York. The City of New York, Appellant and Respondent; Thomas O. Woolf, Respondent and Appellant; Fritz Selje et al., Respondents, 1900 — 162 N.Y. 661 · caselaw · US
Corporations
In the Matter of the Application of The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York Relative to Acquiring Title to the Lands, Tenements and Hereditaments Required for the Purpose of Opening One Hundred and Seventy-fifth Street from the Grand Boulevard and Concourse to Anthony Avenue, in the Twenty-fourth Ward of the City of New York. The City of New York, Appellant and Respondent; Thomas O. Woolf, Respondent and Appellant; Fritz Selje et al., Respondents
162 N.Y. 661·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Landón, JJ. Absent: Vann, J.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York Relative to Acquiring Title to the Lands, Tenements and Hereditaments Required for the Purpose of Opening One Hundred and Seventy-fifth Street from the Grand Boulevard and Concourse to Anthony Avenue, in the Twenty-fourth Ward of the City of New York. The City of New York, Appellant and Respondent; Thomas O. Woolf, Respondent and Appellant; Fritz Selje et al., Respondents.
Matter of East 175th Street, 49 App. Div. 114, affirmed.
(Argued April 17, 1900;
decided May 1, 1900.)
Cross-appeals from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 21, 1900, modifying and affirming as modified an order of Special Term denying a motion to confirm the report of the commissioners of estimate and assessment of the city of New York and referring the said report back to the commissioners with a direction to limit the assessments for benefit to one-half of the value of the property assessed as valued by the tax commissioners^ for the purpose of taxation, as of the time when title vested herein, and confirming the said report.
John Whalen, Corporation Counsel (John P. Dunn and Thomas C. Blake of counsel), for the city of New York, appellant and respondent.
William A. Hoar and James A. Deering for Thomas O. Woolf, respondent and appellant.
Joseph A. Flannery, Charles V. Gabriel, Ernest Hall and Thomas S. Bassford for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Landón, JJ. Absent: Vann, J.