Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Ideal Basic Industries, Inc., 1969 — 395 U.S. 936 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
United States v. Ideal Basic Industries, Inc.
395 U.S. 936·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Harlan are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. · Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1279.
United States v. Ideal Basic Industries, Inc.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, Harris Weinstein, and Grant W. Wiprud for the United States.
Harry R. Horrow and Stephen J. Martin for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Harlan are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.