Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Clark v. Barlow et al., 1941 — 314 U.S. 675 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Clark v. Barlow et al.
314 U.S. 675·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration and decision of these applications.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 695.
Clark v. Barlow et al.
November 10, 1941.
Mr. Carl L. Ristine for petitioner. Mr. Dean Hill Stanley for Lester P. Barlow, and Assistant Attorney General Shea and Messrs. Warner W. Gardner, Sidney J. Kaplan, and Paul A. Sweeney for Henry Morgenthau, Jr., Secretary of the Treasury, et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, and motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis, denied.
Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration and decision of these applications.