Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Daily Press, Inc. v. United Press International et al., 1969 — 396 U.S. 990 · caselaw · US
General
Daily Press, Inc. v. United Press International et al.
396 U.S. 990·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 607.
Daily Press, Inc. v. United Press International et al.
Eugene Driker for petitioner. H. William Butler and Richard F. Stevens for United Press International, Leslie W. Fleming for Evening News Assn., and Kenneth Murray and Brownson Murray for Knight Newspapers, Inc., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.