Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles R. Stirling, Appellant, v. James Harrison, Respondent, 1875 — 65 N.Y. 561 · caselaw · US
General
Charles R. Stirling, Appellant, v. James Harrison, Respondent
65 N.Y. 561·New York Commission of Appeals·1875·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles R. Stirling, Appellant, v. James Harrison, Respondent.
(Submitted January 5,1875;
decided May term, 1875.)
This was an appeal from an order of General Term reversing a judgment, entered upon the report of a referee. It was not stated in the order that the reversal was upon questions of fact. Held, that there was some evidence sufficient to sustain the findings of the referee, and that they were conclusive. Some questions as to the reception of evidence were considered, but no question of general .interest was presented.
G. Frost for the appellant.
J. 0. Fyfcmcm, for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Lott, Ch. C.,]
Lott, Ch. C.,
reads for reversal of order and for affirmance of judgment entered upon the report of the referee.
All concur.
Order reversed and judgment accordingly.