Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Horace Russell et al., as Executors and Trustees under the Will of Henry Hilton, Deceased, Appellants and Respondents, v. Edward B. Hilton et al., Respondents. Albert B. Hilton et al., Appellants; Helen Hilton et al., Respondents and Appellants, 1903 — 175 N.Y. 525 · caselaw · US
General
Horace Russell et al., as Executors and Trustees under the Will of Henry Hilton, Deceased, Appellants and Respondents, v. Edward B. Hilton et al., Respondents. Albert B. Hilton et al., Appellants; Helen Hilton et al., Respondents and Appellants
175 N.Y. 525·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Horace Russell et al., as Executors and Trustees under the Will of Henry Hilton, Deceased, Appellants and Respondents, v. Edward B. Hilton et al., Respondents. Albert B. Hilton et al., Appellants; Helen Hilton et al., Respondents and Appellants.
Russell v. Hilton, 80 App. Div. 178, affirmed.
(Argued June 9, 1903;
decided June 25, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 6, 1903, which modified and affirmed as modified a judgment of Special Term construing the will of Henry Hilton, deceased.
Jabish Holmes, Jr., Horace Russell and James S. Darcy for plaintiffs, appellants and respondents.
Franklin Bartlett and Morris J. Hirsch for Albert B. Hilton et al., appellants.
J. Newton Fiero and Nathaniel S. Smith for Helen Hilton et al., respondents and appellants.
Welton C. Percy and George M. Wright for Joseph F. Sanxay, appellant and respondent.
Arthur H. Van Brunt for E. Francis Hyde, appellant and respondent.
Henry W. Taft for Josephine Russell et al., appellants and respondents.
David McClure for Cornelia H. Hughes, respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Vann, JJ.