Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
PHELPER v. DECKER, SHERIFF, 1966 — 385 U.S. 18 · caselaw · US
General
PHELPER v. DECKER, SHERIFF
385 U.S. 18·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Mr. Justice Stewart concurs for the reasons stated in his separate memorandum in Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U. S. 643, 672. · Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent and would deny the petition for a writ of certiorari.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
PHELPER v. DECKER, SHERIFF.
No. 374.
Decided October 17, 1966.
Charles W. Tessmer and Emmett Colvin, Jr., for petitioner.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The order of May 6, 1966, denying the motion for a certificate of probable cause is reversed.
Mr. Justice Stewart concurs for the reasons stated in his separate memorandum in Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U. S. 643, 672.
Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent and would deny the petition for a writ of certiorari.