General
Eastern States Petroleum Corp. v. Prettyman, Chief Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, et al.; WORZ, Inc., v. Prettyman, Chief Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, et al.; Odum v. Illinois; and Foutty v. Marshall, Common Pleas Court Judge, Franklin County
361 U.S. 805·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 34,
No. 112,
No. 139,
No. 172,
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Eastern States Petroleum Corp. v. Prettyman, Chief Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, et al.; WORZ, Inc., v. Prettyman, Chief Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, et al.; Odum v. Illinois; and Foutty v. Marshall, Common Pleas Court Judge, Franklin County.
Gerard R. Moran and Edwin G. Martin for petitioner in No. 34, Mise. Eliot C. Lovett for petitioner in No. 112; Mise. Petitioners pro se in Nos. 139, Mise., and 172, Mise. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Alan S. Rosenthal and Seymour Farber for respondents in No. 34, Mise. Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon, Ernest L. Folk III, John L. Fitzgerald and Max D. Paglin for respondents and' for the Federal Communications Commission in opposition in No. 112, Mise.
[MAJORITY]
Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of mandamus denied.
Reported below: No. 34, Mise., 105 U. S. App. D, C. 219, 265 F. 2d 593; No. 112, Mise., 106 U. S. App. D. C. 14, 268 F. 2d 889.