Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Sexton v. United States; Neaveill v. Andolsek et al.; Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp. et al.; Holding v. BVA Credit Corp.; Koros et ux. v. Credit Bureau, Inc., of Georgia et al.; Jenkins v. Evening Star Newspaper Co., et al.; Yates v. United States Civil Service Commission; Collins v. United States; Restrepo-Granda v. United States; Wayland v. Town of Topsfield; Key v. Georgia; Bloch et ux. v. Suffolk County Federal Savings & Loan Assn.; Mahler v. United States, 1979 — 439 U.S. 1104 · caselaw · US