Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Burkard Griebel, Appellant, v. The Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Respondent, 1906 — 184 N.Y. 528 · caselaw · US
General
Burkard Griebel, Appellant, v. The Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Respondent
184 N.Y. 528·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Burkard Griebel, Appellant, v. The Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Respondent.
Griebel v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 95 App. Div. 214, affirmed.
(Argued January 24, 1906;
decided February 13, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division .of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 23, 1904, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
J. Stewart Ross for appellant.
I. R. Oeland and George D. Yeomans for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gbay, O’Bbien, Edwabd T. Babtlett, Webneb, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.