Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Pappadio v. United States, 1965 — 382 U.S. 916 · caselaw · US
Criminal Law · MBE-tested
Pappadio v. United States
382 U.S. 916·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 442.
Pappadio v. United States.
Jacob Kossman for petitioner. Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted limited to Questions 1, 2, and 3 presented by the petition which read as follows:
“1. Whether petitioner should have been granted a trial by jury on a charge of criminal contempt of court where he has been sentenced to two years’ imprisonment.
“2. Whether the District Court could legally sentence petitioner to two years’ imprisonment for contempt of court following a non-jury hearing under Rule 42 (b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
“3. Whether, assuming arguendo that a sentence of two years may be imposed for criminal contempt without a trial by jury, there was an abuse of discretion in sentencing petitioner to two years’ imprisonment for refusing to answer five questions where he had answered more than one hundred questions.”
Case placed on the summary calendar and set for argument immediately following No. 412.