General
OHIO ex rel. KLAPP, PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, v. DAYTON POWER & LIGHT CO. et al.
359 U.S. 552·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
OHIO ex rel. KLAPP, PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, v. DAYTON POWER & LIGHT CO. et al.
No. 851.
Decided June 1, 1959.
Robert Houston French, Haveth E. Mau and R. K. Wilson for petitioner.
Julian de Bruyn Kops for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for writ, of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is reversed. Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 3 Cranch 267; Removal Cases, 100 U. S. 457; Indianapolis v. Chase National Bank, 314 U. S. 63.