Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. James Conway, Respondent, v. The Board of Fire Commissioners of the Village of Saratoga Springs et al., Appellants; The People of the State of New York ex rel. Lott Delaney, Respondent, v. Same, Appellants, 1896 — 149 N.Y. 575 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York ex rel. James Conway, Respondent, v. The Board of Fire Commissioners of the Village of Saratoga Springs et al., Appellants; The People of the State of New York ex rel. Lott Delaney, Respondent, v. Same, Appellants
149 N.Y. 575·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. James Conway, Respondent, v. The Board of Fire Commissioners of the Village of Saratoga Springs et al., Appellants. The People of the State of New York ex rel. Lott Delaney, Respondent, v. Same, Appellants.
People ex rel. v. Fire Comrs., 90 Hun, 515, affirmed.
(Argued April 6, 1896;
decided April 21, 1896.)
Appeals from orders of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, made December 3, 1895, which reversed, on certiorari, the proceedings of appellants in dismissing the relators from the fire department of the village of Saratoga Springs.
A. W. Shepard for appellants.
James T. Brusnihan for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Orders affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.