General
Sigmund Seelig et al., Copartners Trading as Pedigree Undergarment Co., Appellants, v. Fabrics Processing Corp., Respondent
269 A.D. 742·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1945·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sigmund Seelig et al., Copartners Trading as Pedigree Undergarment Co., Appellants, v. Fabrics Processing Corp., Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order and judgment affirmed, with costs. Mo opinion. Present —- Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Dore and Callahan, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and deny the motion on the ground that under the circumstances here the question of whether there was an intent to sign the memorandum by a duly authorized agent of the party to be charged is one of fact.