General
HENDRYX et al. v. PERKINS
116 F. 1020·United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·1902
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HENDRYX et al. v. PERKINS.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
June 10, 1902.)
No. 378.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.
For former opinion, see 114 Fed. 801.
Before PUTNAM, Circuit Judge, and ALDRICH and BROWN, District Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Having examined the petition for a rehearing which the appellee, Perkins, on April 29, 1902, moved for leave to file, the mandate then having issued, it is our determination that leave should not be granted. Judge ALDRICH, viewing the motion as addressed to the judges joining in the opinion of the court, takes no action thereon. Leave to the appellee to file petition for a rehearing denied.