Criminal Law · MBE-tested
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Daniel Panitz, Appellant, v. Herman J. Ruthazer, as Warden of the House of Detention for Men, County of Queens, Respondent
15 A.D.2d 800·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1962·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Daniel Panitz, Appellant, v. Herman J. Ruthazer, as Warden of the House of Detention for Men, County of Queens, Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Relator urges that the documents upon which the amended warrant of the Acting Governor of New York was issued do not meet the test of section 830 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, since the affidavit submitted in support of the information lodged against relator in Florida was executed subsequent thereto. In our opinion, the requirements of section 830 of the Code of Criminal Procedure have been met (People ex rel. Moore v. Skinner, 284 App. Div. 770). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.