Contracts · MBE-tested
Holmes, Booth & Haydens, Respondent, v. Eberhard Faber, Appellant
52 A.D. 626·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Holmes, Booth & Haydens, Respondent, v. Eberhard Faber, Appellant.
Judgment and order reversed, new trial ordered, costs-to appellant to abide event.— Appeal from a. judgment entered upon a verdict and from an order denying a new trial.—
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
In this case the same question is presented as in the case of Leonard v. Faber, decided herewith (Ante, p. 495). It arises in the same way and must be determined upon the same considerations. The* judgment should, therefore, be reversed and. a new trial granted, with costs to appellant * to abide event. Van Brunt, P..,: dissented.. Present—Van Brunt, P. J., Rumsey, Patterson, Ingraham and McLaughlin, JJ.