Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Schmitz et al. v. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales, S. A., et al., 1967 — 387 U.S. 908 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Schmitz et al. v. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales, S. A., et al.
387 U.S. 908·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1062.
Schmitz et al. v. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales, S. A., et al.
Daniel W. O’Donoghue and Ross O’Donoghue for petitioners. John J. Wilson and Frank H. Strickler for Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales, S. A., and Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Sanders, Morton Hollander and Richard S. Salzman for the Secretary of the Treasury, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.