Corporations
Pennsylvania v. Budd Company et al.
349 U.S. 935·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 701.
Pennsylvania v. Budd Company et al.
Herbert B. Cohen, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and George W. Keitel and Howell C. Mette, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellant.
Henry S. Drinker, Leslie M. Swope and James J. Dough-erty for the Budd Company, and Charles E. Kenworthey and Roy J. Keefer for the Westinghouse Electric Corporation, appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District.
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for failure to properly present a federal question. As to questions not subject to review by appeal, the papers whereon the appeal was taken are treated as a petition for writ of certiorari and certiorari is denied for the reason that the judgments rest on adequate state grounds.