General
BURGESS v. HILLMAN et al.
200 F. 932·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1912
Before SANBOKN and CARLAND, Circuit Judges, and W. H. MUNGER, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BURGESS v. HILLMAN et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
December 3, 1912.)
No. 3,737.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansa s.
Action by T. J. Burgess against Amiel M. Hillman and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
Lee Monroe, of Topeka, Kan. (C. M. Monroe, of Topeka, Kan., on the brief), for appellant.
John E. Hessin, of Manhattan, Kan., for appellees.
Before SANBOKN and CARLAND, Circuit Judges, and W. H. MUNGER, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — CARLAND, Circuit Judge.]
CARLAND, Circuit Judge.
This case was submitted together with No. 3,728, 200 Fed. 929, and raises the same questions that were disposed of in that case. For the reason stated in the opinion filed therein, the decree in this case must be affirmed; and it is so ordered.