Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
PHINNEY v. SHEPPARD, &c., HOSPITAL TRUSTEES, 1900 — 177 U.S. 170 · caselaw · US
General
PHINNEY v. SHEPPARD, &c., HOSPITAL TRUSTEES
177 U.S. 17044 L. Ed. 720·Supreme Court of the United States·1900
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
PHINNEY v. SHEPPARD, &c., HOSPITAL TRUSTEES.
ERROR TO THE COURT OE APPEALS OE THE STATE OP MARYLAND.
No. 392.
Submitted March 19, 1900.
Decided April 9, 1900.
Dismissed on the authorities cited.
This was a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction.
Mr. William Pinkney White, Mr. George R. Willis and Mr. Francis T. Homer for the motion.
Mr. Abner McKinley and Mr. E. J. D. Cross opposing.
[MAJORITY — The Chiee Justice:]
The Chiee Justice:
Cause reported in state court, 88 Maryland, 633. Writ of error dismissed on the authority of Williams v. Eggleston, 170 U. S. 304, 309; Hamblin v. Western Land Company, 147 U. S. 531; Wilson v. North Carolina, 169 U. S. 586, 595.