Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ralph ARTIGLIERI et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee, 1933 — 66 F.2d 1008 · caselaw · US
General
Ralph ARTIGLIERI et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee
66 F.2d 1008·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ralph ARTIGLIERI et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.
No. 5091.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
July 5, 1933.
Joseph C. Cassini, of Orange, N. J., for appellant.
Harlan Besson, U. S. Atty., of Trenton, N. J.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a sentence of the defendants based on a verdict of guilty of passing counterfeit money. If believed, tho testimony warranted conviction. It was submitted to the jury in a charge to which no objection was made or exception taken. Finding no error and being satisfied the defendants had a fair trial, the judgments of sentence are affirmed.