Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Central Railroad Co. of New Jersey et al. v. Neeld, Director, Division of Taxation, Department of Treasury, et al., 1958 — 357 U.S. 928 · caselaw · US
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Central Railroad Co. of New Jersey et al. v. Neeld, Director, Division of Taxation, Department of Treasury, et al.
357 U.S. 928·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1010.
Central Railroad Co. of New Jersey et al. v. Neeld, Director, Division of Taxation, Department of Treasury, et al.
Augustus Nasmith for the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Co., Joseph C. Olavin for the Pennsylvania Railroad Co. et al., and Raymond J. Lamb for the Erie Railroad Co. et al., petitioners. David D. Furman, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Theodore L. Botter and William L. Boyan, Deputy Attorneys General, for Neeld, Leo Rosenblum for the City of Jersey City et al., James Rosen for the Township of Weehawken, Herbert H. Fine for the City of Hoboken, Vincent J. Casale for the City of Newark, and Norman Heine for the City of Camden, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Supreme Court of New Jersey. Certiorari denied.