General
KEASBEY & MATTISON CO. v. PHILIP CAREY CO.
121 F. 1023·United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York·1903
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
KEASBEY & MATTISON CO. v. PHILIP CAREY CO.
(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.
March 2, 1903.)
Edward K. Jones, for the motion.
Kenyon & Kenyon, opposed.
[MAJORITY — LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.]
LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.
The motion for an order directing that all further evidence be taken in open court is denied. The court has carefully read the deposition of the witness Mattison. called by the complainant, including the 1,300 cross-questions, and all the objections and comments of counsel which accompanied the taking of the testimony. No comment is now made on this fraction of the record. It will have to be considered by the judge who hears the cause, in connection with the other evidence. In view of the impression produced by this examination of the deposition, however, it may be proper to suggest to counsel for the defendants that they might with advantage to themselves make the most of such time as remains out of that allotted for the taking of their proofs.