IP
CROSSLEY v. DUGGAN
79 F. 992·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1897
Before DALLAS, Circuit Judge, and BUTLER and WALES, District Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CROSSLEY v. DUGGAN.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
February 22, 1897.)
Patents—Apparatus for Molding Earthenware.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New J'ersey.
For opinion, see 71 Fed. 967.
Francis T. Chambers and F. C. Lowthrop, for appellant.
James Buchanan, for appellee.
Before DALLAS, Circuit Judge, and BUTLER and WALES, District Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The judges by whom this case was heard, including the late Judge WALES, had, some time previous to his death, all agreed upon the disposition to be made of it. The survivors of those who then constituted the court do not deem it necessary, under the circumstances, to do more than announce the judgment which had thus been unanimously determined upon. In accordance therewith the decree of the court below is affirmed.