Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Szold v. Outlet Embroidery Supply Co., 1938 — 303 U.S. 623 · caselaw · US
General
Szold v. Outlet Embroidery Supply Co.
303 U.S. 623·Supreme Court of the United States·1938
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 427.
Szold v. Outlet Embroidery Supply Co.
Argued February 28, 1938.
Decided March 7, 1938.
Messrs. Eugene L. Garey and Earl J. Garey submitted the cause on brief for appellant. Mr. Henry Epstein, Solicitor General, with whom Mr. John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney General, of New York, was on the brief, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
As it appears, after hearing argument, that no substantial federal question is involved, the appeal is dismissed. (1) Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U. S. 114, 122, 123; Watson v. Maryland, 218 U. S. 173, 176, 177; Semler v. Dental Examiners, 294 U. S. 608, 611, 612; (2) Second Employers’ Liability Cases, 223 U. S. 1, 52; New York Central R. Co. v. White, 243 U. S. 188, 207; (3) Liebermann v. Van De Carr, 199 U. S. 552, 562; Douglas v. Noble, 261 U. S. 165, 168, 169; Highland Farms Dairy v. Agnew, 300 U. S. 608, 612.