Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Harry S. Henry, Appellant, v. Monroe Salisbury, Respondent, 1902 — 170 N.Y. 567 · caselaw · US
General
Harry S. Henry, Appellant, v. Monroe Salisbury, Respondent
170 N.Y. 567·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Harry S. Henry, Appellant, v. Monroe Salisbury, Respondent.
Henry v. Salisbury, 34 App. Div. 631, affirmed.
(Argued January 28, 1902;
decided February 11, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 2, 1898, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Benjamin Steinhardt for appellant.
H. M. Whitehead for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.