Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
ENERNOC, INC., et al., petitioners, v. ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLY ASSOCIATION, et al., 2015 — 136 S. Ct. 25 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
ENERNOC, INC., et al., petitioners, v. ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLY ASSOCIATION, et al.
136 S. Ct. 25192 L. Ed. 2d 996·Supreme Court of the United States·2015
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ENERNOC, INC., et al., petitioners,
v.
ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLY ASSOCIATION, et al.
No. 14-841.
Supreme Court of the United States
Sept. 28, 2015.
Motion of the Solicitor General for divided argument granted.
[MAJORITY — Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.]
Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.