Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Petition of W. F. KNEBELKAMP to Revise an Order of the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Kentucky in the Case of the NATIONAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Bankrupt, 1926 — 11 F.2d 1011 · caselaw · US
Corporations
In the Matter of the Petition of W. F. KNEBELKAMP to Revise an Order of the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Kentucky in the Case of the NATIONAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Bankrupt
11 F.2d 1011·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Petition of W. F. KNEBELKAMP to Revise an Order of the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Kentucky in the Case of the NATIONAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Bankrupt.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
January 12, 1926.)
No. 4435.
Petition to Revise an Order of the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Kentucky; Charles H. Moor-man, Judge.
Thos. A. Barker and W. W. Downing, both of Louisville, Ky., for petitioner.
D. A. Sachs, Jr., and Emile Steinfeld, both of Louisville, Ky., for respondent.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree of the District Court affirmed, with costs.