General
Charles J. Roussel, Respondent, v. Armitage Mathews, as Receiver of Plock, Steinbach & Murray, et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others
171 N.Y. 634·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles J. Roussel, Respondent, v. Armitage Mathews, as Receiver of Plock, Steinbach & Murray, et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others.
Roussel v. Mathews, 62 App. Div. 1, affirmed.
(Argued April 4, 1902;
decided April 18, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 15, 1901, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee.
William S. Bennet for appellants.
Daniel Whitford and William Lloyd Kitchel for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Vann, JJ.