Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Amelia Gorman, as Executrix of John J. Gorman, Deceased, Respondent, v. Daniel E. Finn et al., Appellants. (Actions 1 and 2.), 1902 — 171 N.Y. 651 · caselaw · US
General
Amelia Gorman, as Executrix of John J. Gorman, Deceased, Respondent, v. Daniel E. Finn et al., Appellants. (Actions 1 and 2.)
171 N.Y. 651·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Amelia Gorman, as Executrix of John J. Gorman, Deceased, Respondent, v. Daniel E. Finn et al., Appellants. (Actions 1 and 2.)
(Submitted May 5, 1902;
decided May 13, 1902.)
[MAJORITY]
Motion to amend the remittitur so as to award the respondent separate bills of costs in each case denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 171 N. Y. 628.)