Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. et al., Trustees, et al., 1947 — 332 U.S. 790 · caselaw · US
General
St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. et al., Trustees, et al.
332 U.S. 790·Supreme Court of the United States·1947
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Certiorari Denied.
(See also No. 117, Misc. and No. 121, Misc., supra.)
Nos. 211 and 212.
St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. et al., Trustees, et al.
William V. Hodges and Daniel Bartlett for petitioner.
Leonard D. Adkins and George D. Gibson for Stedman et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari denied.