General
Lafayette Brass Mfg. Co., Inc. v. United States
60 Cust. Ct. 1014·United States Customs Court·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. P68/129.
protests 62/5997 and 63/4027 (New York).
Lafayette Brass Mfg. Co., Inc. v. United States,
[MAJORITY — Rao, C. J.]
Rao, C. J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “B” covered by the foregoing protests consist of hoze nozzles in chief value of brass similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Lipman's (52 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859); that the items marked “C” consist of hose nozzles in chief value of zinc the same in all material respects, except the component material of chief value, as those the subject of C.A.D. 859, supra; and that the items marked “D” consist of sprays or couplings in chief value of brass, used in place of a nozzle such as that involved in said C.A.D. 859, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.