General
CARROLL v. TEXAS
392 U.S. 664·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CARROLL v. TEXAS.
No. 1224,
Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968.
Don Gladden and Sam Houston Clinton, Jr., for petitioner.
Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, and Howard M. Fender, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Rideau v. Louisiana, 373 U. S. 723.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.