Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
FIDELITY & DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, Appellant, v. L. B. HANNA et al., Appellees, 1926 — 17 F.2d 1012 · caselaw · US
General
FIDELITY & DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, Appellant, v. L. B. HANNA et al., Appellees
17 F.2d 1012·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
FIDELITY & DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, Appellant, v. L. B. HANNA et al., Appellees.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
December 17, 1926.)
No. 7543.
Appeal from the District Court of, the United States- for the District of North Dakota.
H. F. O’Hare, E. B. Cos, and Gordon V. Cos, all of Bismarck, N. D., and J. F. Sullivan, of Mandan, N. D., for appellant.
Pierce, Tenneson, Cupler & Stambaugh, of Fargo, N. D., George F. Short, of Oklahoma City, Okl., and Scott Cameron, of Bismarck, N. D., for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed, without costs to either party in this court, per stipulation of parties.