Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
International Union, U. A. W., A. F. of L., Local 232, et al. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board et al., 1948 — 333 U.S. 853 · caselaw · US
General
International Union, U. A. W., A. F. of L., Local 232, et al. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board et al.
333 U.S. 853·Supreme Court of the United States·1948
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nos. 580 and 581.
International Union, U. A. W., A. F. of L., Local 232, et al. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board et al.
J. Albert Woll and Herbert S. Thatcher for petitioners.
John E. Martin, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and Stewart G. Honeck, Deputy Attorney General, for the Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, respondent. Edgar L. Wood, Richard H. Tyrrell and Bernard V. Brady for the Briggs & Stratton Corp., respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Certiorari granted.