Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Susan Hamilton, as Administratrix of William Hamilton, Deceased, Appellant, v. Catherine Brennan, Respondent, 1897 — 154 N.Y. 738 · caselaw · US
General
Susan Hamilton, as Administratrix of William Hamilton, Deceased, Appellant, v. Catherine Brennan, Respondent
154 N.Y. 738·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Susan Hamilton, as Administratrix of William Hamilton, Deceased, Appellant, v. Catherine Brennan, Respondent.
Hamilton v. Brennan, 90 Hun, 340, affirmed.
(Argued October 8, 1897;
decided October 26, 1897.)
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February ‘18, 1896, and an order made November 15,1895, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court dismissing the complaint on trial at Circuit, without a jury.
Delos MeOurdy and John Yard for appellant.
Eernard J. Tinney for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.