Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
KATHLEEN MATHER v. WAREHOUSE POINT MASONIC HALL CORPORATION
249 Conn. 928·Connecticut Supreme Court·1999·CT
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
KATHLEEN MATHER v. WAREHOUSE POINT MASONIC HALL CORPORATION
[MAJORITY]
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 53 Conn. App. 399 (AC 18060), is denied.
[DISSENT — BERDON, J.,]
BERDON, J.,
dissenting. Notwithstanding LaFleur v. Farmington River Power Co., 187 Conn. 339, 343, 445 A.2d 924 (1982), I would grant certification on the following issue: Whether the Appellate Court correctly relied on the general verdict rule to preclude appellate review in this case.
J. Christopher Kervick, in support of the petition.
James V. Somers, Kevin M. Roche and Laura Pascóle Zaino, in opposition.
Decided June 30, 1999